Rueger and Moyers v. Natural Resources Board and the District 9 Environmental Commission of the State of Vermont
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment order in favor of defendants in this Access to Public Records Act case. The court concluded that certain records held by defendants reflected the deliberations of an agency acting in a quasi-judicial role and thus were exempt from disclosure under V.S.A. § 317(e)(24). Plaintiffs argue that the court erred in interpreting §317(c)(24). We affirm.
¶2. The court found the following facts undisputed. Plaintiffs are parties to a contested Act 250 proceeding concerning a proposed gravel pit near their homes in Bristol, Vermont. In…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In the Matter of Union Leader CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Curtis Hier v. Slate Valley Unified School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- Toensing v. Attorney Gen. of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Toensing v. Attorney Gen. of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- Lanpher v. Town of MorristownVermont Superior Court · 2017
- O'Brien Farm Road, LLC Appeal - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.