Fair Cadillac-Oldsmobile Isuzu Partnership v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The sole issue in this case is whether General Statutes § 53-301,1 which prohibits a party engaged in the business of selling motor vehicles from selling them on Sunday, violates the state constitution. Because we conclude that § 53-301 violates substantive due process under article first, § 8, of the state constitution2 we need not reach the plaintiffs’ other state constitutional claims.3
*314The plaintiffs are nine motor vehicle dealerships located in Danbury.4 They instituted this suit in order to obtain a declaratory judgment5 that § 53-301 is unconstitutional, and to enjoin the defendant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Justin Dean ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.