Legal Opinion

Fair Cadillac-Oldsmobile Isuzu Partnership v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 24, 1994No. 14806PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether General Statutes § 53-301,1 which prohibits a party engaged in the business of selling motor vehicles from selling them on Sunday, violates the state constitution. Because we conclude that § 53-301 violates substantive due process under article first, § 8, of the state constitution2 we need not reach the plaintiffs’ other state constitutional claims.3

*314The plaintiffs are nine motor vehicle dealerships located in Danbury.4 They instituted this suit in order to obtain a declaratory judgment5 that § 53-301 is unconstitutional, and to enjoin the defendant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. State v. LammeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Justin Dean ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API