Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weaver v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1981No. Appeal, No. 1498 C.D. 1980Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Craig:

I respectfully dissent because claimant’s union office resignation merely relegated him to his actual seniority. The employer’s lack of work was the basic cause of the layoff.

In Labor and Industry Department v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 518, 521, 3 A.2d 211, 213 (1938), cited with approval in Hammerstone v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 32 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 256, 378 A.2d 1040 (1977), the court stated:

*140[t]he phrase ‘voluntarily leaving work’ in Section 402(b)(1) means that ‘he left of his own motion; he was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Labor & Industry Department v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Employment Security v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Hammerstone v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. D'Amato Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Fisher v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API