Legal Opinion

United States v. Rene Madrid

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1998No. 97-3959PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Rene Madrid appeals his drug convictions, arguing that evidence seized from his house was the fruit of an illegal search and was improperly received under the inevitable discovery doctrine. Because we decline to extend the inevitable discovery doctrine to the facts of this case, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

I

On August 9, 1996, the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Mid-Iowa Drug Task Force, and local law enforcement agencies prepared for the delivery of a kilogram each of methamphetamine and cocaine by Arturo Martinez to Special…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Kevin P. DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. JadloweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Douglas Lynn PenningtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. State v. McGraneSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. United States v. Arnaldo Losoya ManciasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API