Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 26, 2013No. Case No. 13-22522-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REMAND [ECF No. 15]; DENYING AS MOOT MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [ECF No. 6], STAY DISCOVERY [ECF No. 34], AND STAY ARBITRATION [ECF No. 42]; CLOSING CASE
ALAN S. GOLD, District Judge.
This Cause is before the Court upon Defendant NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.’s (“NCL”) Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 6], Plaintiffs Motion for Remand [ECF No. 15], and various related Motions. Having reviewed the pleadings and record, and being otherwise duly advised, I conclude this case does not meet the jurisdictional prerequisites of the Convention on Recognition and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Freudensprung v. Offshore Technical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Rizalyn Bautista v. Star CruisesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Hills McGee v. Sentinel Offender Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016