Legal Opinion

City of Doniphan v. Cantley.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 3, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRag-Land, J.

For a statement of the facts we quote from appellant’s abstract of the record as follows:

"This proceeding was commenced by the filing of an application, under the statute, by the City of Doniphan, a city of the fourth class, incorporated under the laws of the State of Missouri, with respondent, S. L. Cantley, Commissioner of Finance oE the State of Missouri, in charge of the Ripley County Bank, a banking corporation, which failed on the 20th day of November, 1930, and was placed in the hands of the said Finance Commissioner for liquidation. The application asked to have the claim (for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. McGregory v. GaskillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Bank of Darlington v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. McGuire v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Fleischaker v. FleischakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Gray v. Doe Run Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Becker v. Farmers' Exchange Bank of GallatinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API