Legal Opinion
MATTER OF BRIGUGLIO v. Bd. of Parole
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 1969PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScileppi, J.
The principal question raised on this appeal is whether a prospective parolee has a constitutional right to he represented by counsel at a hearing before the Board of Parole.. Appellant Salvatore Briguglio was convicted of the crime of attempted grand larceny in the first degree. He was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from two to four years, which he began to serve on August 5, 1966. On October 29, 1967, after 16 months of imprisonment, appellant became eligible for parole. On August 8, 1967 he was examined by the Board of Parole as required by statute (Correction Law, §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- MATTER OF SILMON v. TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Joseph Menechino v. Russell G. Oswald, as Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole, New Yorkstate Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Beckworth v. New Jersey State Parole BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Monks v. New Jersey State Parole BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Cicero v. OlgiatiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.