Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Department of Professional Regulation v. Manos

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2002No. 93299 RelPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Defendants, Drs. Thomas G. Manos and Mark Kolozenski, refused to produce two patient dental records and patient appointment schedules named in a subpoena duces tecum issued by plaintiff, the Department of Professional Regulation (hereafter Department), pursuant to section 60d of the Civil Administrative Code of Illinois (20 ILCS 2105/60d (West 1998) (recodified as 20 ILCS 2105/2105 — 105 (West 2000))). Upon granting the Department’s motion for summary judgment, the circuit court of Cook County ordered defendants to produce the records requested in the Department’s subpoena duces tecum with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. WoodardIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. RiveraIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Brucker v. MercolaIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gaffney v. Board of Trustees of the Orland Fire Protection DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hines v. Department of Public AidIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. RinehartIllinois Supreme Court · 2012

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API