Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. Schanland

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 7, 1924No. 25838PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

Plaintiff instituted this suit to recover the S. E. % of the N. E. % of section 15, and the S. E. Yk of the N. W. Y, and the S. W. Yk of the N. E. %, and the W. Yz of the N. E. Yi of the S. W. % of section IT, all in township 19, range 11, in the parish of Bossier. He sets out his chain of title, and alleges that neither he nor defendants are in the actual corporeal possession of the property sued for, with the exception of the S. Yz of the N. E. Yk of section 15, which part plaintiff alleges that one of defendants’ authors in title has leased to several persons to enable them to develop it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guillory v. Avoyelles Railway Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  2. Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Laenger v. LaengerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. Board of Com'rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Guillory v. ElmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tillery v. FullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Close v. RowanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Thurmon v. HoggSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. ButlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  5. Gayle v. SlicerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API