Legal Opinion

Cales v. Rushing

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1958No. 37160PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error to recover damages from the defendants in error. The parties occupy the same relative position here as in the trial court and, hereinafter, will be referred to by their trial court designation.

The material allegations of the petition aver that plaintiff was a student at Oklahoma Baptist University; that the defendants were members of the faculty or officials of the university; that the defendant Rushing, with the approval of the defendant Tucker, committed an assault and battery upon the plaintiff; that the plaintiff reported…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Collins v. CroninSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  2. Teeters v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Laverty v. VanarsdaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  4. Nissen v. AndresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Colby v. McClendonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. CT Hughes Construction Company v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Edwards v. UriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Edwards v. UriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API