Barber v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORRISON, Judge.
Appellant’s able attorney has urged that we differentiate the case at bar from the holding in several prior cases of robbery wherein we held the facts to be insufficient to support a conviction. In view of the forceful manner in which he urges his motion for rehearing, we shall attempt to do so.
In Peebles v. State, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 53, 134 S. W. 2d 298, the alleged robbery occurred on a crowded street corner in broad daylight, where the slightest outcry would, in all probability, have brought assistance. In that case, there was no weapon exhibited; in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Easley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Peebles and Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Gillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.