Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 2005No. 04-61PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] George Kallei Smith (Smith) appeals his convictions and sentences after a jury trial on five counts of third-degree sexual assault and one count of taking indecent liberties with a child. He claims plain error occurred when the prosecution used improper victim impact argument and testimony; his due process right to a fair trial was violated when, without objection, one of the alleged victims testified while holding a teddy bear; and two types of reversible error occurred during sentencing, viz., unfounded, unproven information was used to penalize him and he was punished…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Justice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Schreibvogel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Sweet v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Jaime Solis v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API