State v. Austin
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHEA, Justice.
A Superior Court jury found the defendant, Thomas H. Austin, guilty of two charges of robbery. The defendant appealed to this court, alleging that the state had violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial and that the trial court erroneously denied his new-trial motion. For the reasons that follow, we affirm his conviction.
The defendant’s grounds for appeal require us to state the facts and the travel of the case in some detail. The two-count indictment against defendant arose from the daytime armed robbery of Saver’s Bank & Trust in East Providence on February…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. GrundySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- Tate v. HowardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BleauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- State v. VerrecchiaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- State v. OliveiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.