Legal Opinion

State v. Shields

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 28, 1977No. C 76-05-06387 & C 76-05-06388, CA 6671PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*721RICHARDSON, J.

This appeal raises the issue of whether the state’s motion to consolidate criminal charges made pursuant to our suggestion in State v. Bishop, 16 Or App 310, 518 P2d 177 (1974), was timely.

Defendant was charged in two separate traffic citations. First, with driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and second, driving with .15% or more alcohol in his blood. A subsequent criminal complaint was filed charging, in two counts, assault in the third degree and resisting arrest. The parties agree the four charges arose out of the same transaction.

The two charges in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ShieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. BaggerlyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. BeltranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API