Legal Opinion
Hale v. Norton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 5, 2007No. 03-36032PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER WITHDRAWING OPINION AND OPINION
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This court’s opinion filed on August 25, 2006, and published at 461 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir.2006), is withdrawn and replaced by the attached opinion.
No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed.
OPINION
In 2002, plaintiffs-appellants (collectively, “the Hales”) purchased 410 acres of land near McCarthy, Alaska. Their property is completely surrounded by the Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve (the “Park”), which was created in 1980. The Hales gain access to their property over…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chehazeh v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- McFarland v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Burlison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- School Board of Avoyelles Parish v. United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Hale v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.