Legal Opinion

Harrill Bros. v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1907PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Civil actioN, beard before Guión, J., at Eebruary Term, 1907, of tbe Superior Court of Rutherfobd County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is a motion to set aside the agreed statement of facts and the judgment thereon wbicb was rendered by Judge Justice at a prior term. the motion was made before Judge Guion at Eebruary Term, 1907, of Rutherford Superior Court. the ground of the motion is tbat the attorney wbo consented to the case and agreed to the submission of it to the Judge for bis decision and judgment, which are set out in the former opinion of tbis Court at tbis term, misunderstood bis associate counsel as to the extent of bis authority, and tbat the ease should have been passed upon by the division counsel of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Many v. Beekman Iron Co.New York Court of Chancery · 1841
  2. Beck v. . BellamySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Hairston v. . GarwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Rogers v. . McKenzieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. Morris v. . GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Gardiner v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Bizzell v. Auto Tire & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Edwards v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Deitz v. . BolchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API