Legal Opinion

State v. Utterback

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1994No. 69,509PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

Michael W. Utterback appeals his jury trial convictions of two counts of forgery (K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-3710). The Court of Appeals held the counts were multiplicitous, affirmed one of the convictions, and reversed the other. 19 Kan. App. 2d 437, 871 P.2d 267 (1994). The matter is before us on the State’s petition for review. The sole issue before us is the propriety of the multiplicity determination.

The underlying facts are rather complex. It is sufficient for our purposes to state the following. Kim and John Manuel entered into a written…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FikeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. State v. GarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  3. State v. DorseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. State v. ChearsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  4. State v. LafoeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  5. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API