Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2005No. S-02-1503Published

1DissentGerrard, J.

The defendant argues the offense of stepchild incest under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-703 (Reissue 1995) is unconstitutionally vague and therefore violates the due process provisions of the U.S. Constitution and the Nebraska Constitution, because it prohibits incest with a “minor” stepchild but does not define “minor.” I agree, as does a majority of this court. But the opinion of this court does not decide whether § 28-703 is unconstitutionally vague, based on the court’s conclusion that the statute’s unconstitutionality is not “plainly evident.” Because this issue involves the constitutionality of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API