Legal Opinion

Forcum v. Forcum

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1983No. Civ. No. 52028PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that where the general provisions of a marital settlement agreement (incorporated by reference into the interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage) do not permit future judicial modification, but the agreement also contains a specific provision on spousal support the legal effect of which is to retain the jurisdiction of the court to *601modify spousal support, the specific provision prevails and the trial court has jurisdiction to modify spousal support.

The interlocutory judgment of dissolution of the marriage of Charles D. Forcum and Lillian R. Forcum…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Mirsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  3. In Re Marriage of AndreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. In Re Marriage of HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. In Re Marriage of AylesworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Marriage of HuffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API