Legal Opinion

Amity Rubberized Pen Co. v. Market Quest Group Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2015No. 13-55796PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

This is a patent case. Congress has directed that appeals of patent cases shall be heard by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and that other circuit courts, including this court, do not have jurisdiction to decide such cases. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1). Thus, this appeal should have been filed with the Federal Circuit. Because, however, it was filed with us, we must decide what to do with it. We hold that the interest of justice would be served by allowing this case to be heard by the Federal Circuit, and so order that it be transferred to that court.

I

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Greene v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Versatop Support Systems v. Georgia Expo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  3. Bojorquez v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  4. Honeywell International, Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  5. Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, L.P. v. NebelDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API