Legal Opinion
Roseman v. Day
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 5, 1962PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
This bill for declaratory relief seeks a determination of the validity of two leases of premises used as a retail drug store at 391 and 393 Columbia Road in the Dorchester district of Boston. The plaintiff Roseman was the original lessee from Jennie C. Day, who died leaving the defendants as her heirs at law. The plaintiff Bird Pharmacy, Inc., is an assignee of the leases from Roseman. A final decree declared that the assignment of the leases is valid; that the leases are in full effect; and that the defendants have no right to terminate. The defendants appealed. There are findings of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- General Electric Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- McFaden v. NordblomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Iannelle v. Fire Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Garrity v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- New Bedford Housing Authority v. OlanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- M.J.G. Properties, Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- New Bedford Housing Authority v. OlanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.