Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Montgomery Drug Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1941No. 8,112PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries. The jury returned a verdict in her favor in the sum of $3,000 and the defendant appealed.

The complaint, as finally amended, charges that on October 10, 1937, plaintiff purchased from the defendant a douche or tube to be used for internal drainage purposes and paid to the defendant the sum of 25^ therefor. It is alleged that defendant ‘ ‘ assured her and warranted to her that it was an appliance suitable and proper for her desired use; that relying upon the assurance and warranty of defendant as aforesaid, plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bolitho v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Ellis v. Montgomery & Crawford, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Bank (N.A.) — Billings v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ryan v. Ald, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Beck v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Maass v. PattersonMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Beck v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API