Legal Opinion

Maass v. Patterson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1949No. 8864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Adair

Suit by Karl Maass, plaintiff, against Edwin A. Patterson and Jennie Patterson, defendants, to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien. From a judgment of dismissal plaintiff appeals.

Amended Complaint. Three causes of action are united in the amended complaint.'

The first cause of action is on an alleged express contract and seeks foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien filed September 24, 1941 and to recover $116.50 and interest, costs and attorney’s fee.

The second cause of action is based on an implied contract and seeks the same relief prayed for in the first cause of action.

The third cause of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ellinghouse v. Ajax Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Burke v. Inter-State Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Streicher v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Missoula Mercantile Co. v. O'DonnellMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State ex rel. La France Copper Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hansen v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API