Randle v. Barnard
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether the appellee George D. Barnard is liable in assumpsit to the appellant, Charles H. Randle, for rent stipulated in a lease made by the appellant to A. C. Ricksecker, it being alleged that Barnard and Ricksecker were partners in the transaction. Trial by jury was waived, and upon a special finding of facts judgment was given for the defendant. The substance of the finding is as follows: In 1892, Randle was erecting a hotel on Fortieth street, a short distance west of Cottage G-rove avenue, in Chicago, and for $100 gave an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Phipps v. HardingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
- Reed v. StappCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1892
- Danforth v. WearSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Palmer v. Aeolian Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Gentry v. SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Randle v. BarnardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1900