Lindholm v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
Three motions are before the Court in these matters: defendants’ motion for reconsideration, defendants’ emergency motion for stay pending appeal, and plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. For the reasons stated herein, all three motions are denied.
First, defendants wish the Court to reconsider its Order of October 8, 1992 (the “October 8 Order”), in which the Court abated in full the jeopardy assessment levied against plaintiff on June 1, 1992. 808 F.Supp. 3. Defendants’ memorandum in support of their motion merely rehashes arguments made to the Court prior…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stebco Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jorge Byron Alegria v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Lindholm v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Lindholm v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992