Legal Opinion

Lindholm v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 28, 1992No. Civ. A. Nos. 92-2044, 92-2136Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

Three motions are before the Court in these matters: defendants’ motion for reconsideration, defendants’ emergency motion for stay pending appeal, and plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. For the reasons stated herein, all three motions are denied.

First, defendants wish the Court to reconsider its Order of October 8, 1992 (the “October 8 Order”), in which the Court abated in full the jeopardy assessment levied against plaintiff on June 1, 1992. 808 F.Supp. 3. Defendants’ memorandum in support of their motion merely rehashes arguments made to the Court prior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Stebco Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Jorge Byron Alegria v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Lindholm v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. Lindholm v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API