Shana Perry v. Autozone Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs Shana Perry, Damon Harper, and Daryl Quiney have filed a motion to recover attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 following Defendant AutoZoner, LLC’s unsuccessful appeal from the district court’s February 3, 2014 order denying Defendant’s motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. This Court, in a per curiam opinion, affirmed the district court’s judgment in its entirety. See Perry v. AutoZone Stores, Inc., 608 Fed.Appx. 388 (6th Cir.2015). Having carefully considered the parties’ submissions, the record, and the applicable law, this Court now…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Reed v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United Slate, Tile and Composition Roofers, Damp and Waterproof Workers Association, Local 307 v. G & M Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Adam v. Airway Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- Apartment Insiders, LLC v. Mirakle HensenDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Betancourt v. Indian Hills Plaza LLC, a Michigan Limited Liabilty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- DEMARKO BROWN and T.F. v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- David Minchella v. Yvonne BrantleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.