Legal Opinion

People v. Rehman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1967No. Crim. 9534PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem *

The appellants Jerome Rehman, Mark Sincoff, Richard Alfred Gorman and Charles Edwin Symes, with several others, were accused by the Grand Jury of Los Angeles County, on June 14, 1962, in a two-count indictment. The case went to jury trial only as to amended count two charging appellants with the crime of conspiracy, in violation of section 182, Penal Code of California, a felony, in that they did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously conspire and agree together, and with other persons, to commit acts injurious to the public health and to violate sections 240 (assault), 242…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. People v. BratisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API