Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duby v. Hicks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1922Published

1Dissent

McCOURT, J.,

Dissenting. — This is a suit to foreclose a lien which plaintiffs claimed to have on an automobile owned by defendant, for the reasonable worth of labor, skill and materials expended *37by plaintiffs upon said automobile at the request of defendant.

It appears from plaintiffs’ complaint that the proceedings for foreclosure were initiated in the manner provided by Or. L., Section 10277, for foreclosure of a lien by advertising and sale of the chattel subject to the lien; that plaintiffs between the fifth and fifteenth days of July, 1919, at the request of defendant, expended labor,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Pilz v. KillingsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gordon v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Coffey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Creecy v. JoyOregon Supreme Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API