Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Dail

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1991No. 27A02-9007-CV-424PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARPNACK, Judge.

Whittaker appeals from a judgment in favor of Dail and the denial of his motion for relief from that judgment under Ind. Trial Rule 60(B)(1). The judgment was for $99,423.90 in actual damages and $198, 757.80 punitive damages. The judgment was entered after the court, without a jury, received evidence presented by Dail on the day the case had previously been set for trial by jury. Neither the defendant Whit-taker nor any attorney representing him was present. We affirm.

Whittaker raises six issues, which we restate and arrange as follows:

1. Could the trial court enter the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Beatrice Mae Hansen v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Taber v. HutsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  5. McFarlan v. Fowler Bank City Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Robbins v. McCarthyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Whittaker v. DailIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bennett v. AndryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Whelchel v. Community Hospitals of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API