Marcavage v. Rendell
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
Respondents have filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to Petitioners’ amended petition for review filed in the Court’s original jurisdiction. Petitioners seek a declaration that the Act of December 3, 2002, P.L. 1176, No. 143 (Act 143) amending Section 2710 of the Crimes Code (ethnic intimidation), 18 Pa. C.S. § 2710, is unconstitutional as violative of the legislative process mandated by Article III, Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Pennsylvania Constitution (Constitution). They also seek to enjoin enforcement of Act 143.
The legislative process…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Scudder v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Common Cause/Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Marcavage v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Smith v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Stilp v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.