Legal Opinion

Marcavage v. Rendell

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Respondents have filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to Petitioners’ amended petition for review filed in the Court’s original jurisdiction. Petitioners seek a declaration that the Act of December 3, 2002, P.L. 1176, No. 143 (Act 143) amending Section 2710 of the Crimes Code (ethnic intimidation), 18 Pa. C.S. § 2710, is unconstitutional as violative of the legislative process mandated by Article III, Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Pennsylvania Constitution (Constitution). They also seek to enjoin enforcement of Act 143.

The legislative process…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Scudder v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Common Cause/Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Marcavage v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Smith v. Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Stilp v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API