Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Newman
I respectfully dissent from the decision announced by the Court this day. I believe that the statute at issue does not “clearly, plainly, and palpably” violate the state or federal Constitution and, accordingly, I would affirm the Order of the trial court granting summary judgment to Crown, Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (Crown).
The General Assembly enacted 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1 (Limitations on Asbestos-Related Liabilities Relating to Certain Mergers or Consolidations) on December 17, 2001, to stem the ever-expanding asbestos-related liabilities of corporations, such as Crown, that incurred…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hotel Casey Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.