Legal Opinion

(PS) Boddie v. Blue Diamond Growers

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 13, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02288Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC S. BODDIE, No. 2:24-cv-02288-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST 14 BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, et. al., AND DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO 15 AMEND Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Eric S. Boddie proceeds pro se in this action which is referred to the undersigned 19 by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff has filed an application in 20 support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis which makes the showing required by 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API