Liggett v. Firestone
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
A paper lias been filed giving what is denominated “ a history of the case,” and stating that “ appellants contend that the sheriff’s sale was not complete till July 7th, 1882.” This statement is all that even approaches an argument, and it certainly is not such a presentation of a point as settled rules require. It is the duty of counsel to do more than make assertions; they should state reasons for their propositions, and, if necessary, cite authorities in their support. In the present instance, we should have been informed why the sale was not complete until July 7th, 1882, and if not…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Hollingsworth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Gates v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Town of New Castle v. GrubbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Ultra Resources, Inc. v. McMurry Energy Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.