Legal Opinion
Stapp v. Overnite Transportation Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 5, 1998No. CIV. A. 96-2320-GTVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
In this action, plaintiff claims that defendant subjected her to disparate treatment based on her gender, hostile-work environment sexual harassment, and retaliation, all in violation of Title VH of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq . Plaintiff also brings state law claims alleging outrage, assault, and battery. The case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 54). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied.
I. Factual Background
The following facts are either…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metzger v. City of LeawoodDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Blailock v. O'BANNONMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Baker v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
- Wanda Blailock v. Shirley O'BannonMississippi Supreme Court · 2000