Rodal v. Crawford
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentPotter, C. J.
Plaintiffs filed a bill to have a drive or passageway established and declared to be a public highway by user or necessity.
Plaintiffs are engaged in commercial fishing on the Great Lakes. They own that part of lot 3, block 3, and the west half of lot 2, block 3, lying south of the railroad track, in the village of Frankfort. This property borders upon the Betsie bay, constituting the harbor at Frankfort, upon which, upon the water, is a dock and warehouse used in connection with plaintiffs’ business.
Defendant is engaged in the taxi business in Frankfort, and in a small manufacturing business.
H…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gayetty v. BethuneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
- Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Carey v. RaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Morgan v. MeuthMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Zemon v. NetzorgMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.