Legal Opinion

Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1954No. 8129Published

1Opinion of the Court

275 P.2d 969 (1954)

Wayne C. PENROSE, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8129.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

October 29, 1954.

Merrill & Merrill, Pocatello, for appellant.

Anderson & Anderson, Pocatello, for respondent.

THOMAS, Justice.

Plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as respondent, instituted an action to recover monthly sick benefit payments under an insurance policy issued to him on November 15, 1945, by defendant, hereinafter referred to as appellant. The matter was tried before a jury. At the close of the evidence appellant made a…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Taylor; Concurrence · Porter.

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Curtis v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Ahmed's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Decatur Mineral Land Co. v. PalmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API