Legal Opinion

Staggs v. Joseph

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 2, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(atfer stating the facts). Under onr practice, where both parties request a peremptory instruction and do nothing more, they thereby submit the case to the court, and the finding of the court has the same binding effect as .the verdict of a jury, and it will be affirmed on appeal if the testimony is legally sufficient to warrant such finding. St. L. S. W. Ry. Co.v. Mulkey, 100 Ark. 71, and Watkins v. Louisiana State Life Ins. Co., 151 Ark. 596.

T. J. Higdon is the common source of title to both parties in this case. He executed a quitclaim deed to said lands to Lee Costly, which is in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MulkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Henry Wrape Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Watkins v. Louisiana State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Bell v. South Arkansas Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tisdale v. GunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Creasey Grocery Corp. v. Southern Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. McGill v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API