Legal Opinion

State v. Sturgess

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J".:

On June 4, 1881, the respondent was indicted by the grand jury of Multnomah county for catching salmon fish in the Columbia river, contrary to the act of the legislative assembly, entitled “An Act to protect salmon,” approved October 25, 1880. He was tried on this indictment in the circuit court for said county and found guilty as charged. The court, however, arrested judgment on motion of the respondent, and the state excepted and appealed. The facts established at the trial, as appears by the bill of exceptions, were that the salmon were caught at eighteen minutes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lutfring v. GœtzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  2. State ex rel. Kellogg v. BishopSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hall v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. CochranOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wampler v. Department of State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Tichner v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API