Legal Opinion

On Motion to Retax Costs

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Counsel for respondent state insurance fund have filed objections to the taxation of costs herein, and in support thereof contend that the department of finance, under C. S., sec. 6291, is in fact respondent, and that this is thus in fact a suit against the state itself; that if any costs are taxed, they are taxed as a charge against the state; that no costs are allowable unless there is an express provision of statute therefor; that C. S., sec. 7212, being a general statute, making no express reference to the state, is not applicable herein; that if these costs are taxed under C. S., sec.…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Brady v. PlaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Storseth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hillman v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Rivera v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API