State v. Hunter
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Because the unchallenged findings of fact indicate that defendant was not under the influence of any impairing substance and answered questions appropriately at the time of his confession, the fact that defendant ingested “crack” cocaine several hours prior to his confession is not sufficient to invalidate a trial court’s finding that defendant’s statements were freely and voluntarily made. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motions to suppress evidence and his statement to law enforcement and his motion to dismiss the first-degree…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DegraphenreedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. MalachiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. DowneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. BenitezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.