Legal Opinion

Malanga v. Royal Indemnity Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1967No. 8878-PRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This matter is before us on petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, Division 2, reported in 4 Ariz.App. 150, 418 P.2d 396.

The appellant, Mary M. Ellis Malanga, instituted this action in superior court against the Royal Indemnity Company, seeking to recover $30,000 allegedly due to appellant as beneficiary of an accident insurance policy which the Company had issued to Jack S. Ellis, who at the time of his death was the husband of appellant. The trial court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment for the Company and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

The following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California State Life Insurance v. FuquaArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Dickerson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Malanga v. Royal Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Central Bearings Co. v. Wolverine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Knight v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Smith v. Hughes Aircraft Co. Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1991
  4. Century Mutual Insurance v. Southern Arizona Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API