Succession of Asbridge

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Súdelo, J.

This case presents two appeals, the one by a creditor, Bartlelle, the other by the heirs of the deceased. Both appeals are from portions of a judgment rendered on a tableau.

Bartlette claimed for professional services rendered to the deceased himself, in judicial proceedings to which the deceased was a party. The judge of the court below reduced his charge. The question of quantum mereuit was presented to the court below on conflicting evidence. It was a question of fact, and we see no error in the judgment of the court below.

*207As to three of…