Legal Opinion

Doe on Demise of Taylor v. Roe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1825PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Iredell. Ejjsctmejvt. The plaintiff’s lessor claimed the land in dispute, lying in Lincoln county, by virtue of a grant issuing to his father in 1768 from the crown of Great Britain. The defendant claimed the land under a grant from the state of North-Carolina of recent date; and contended, that the land was within the boundaries of Earl Gran-mile's grant, which being antecedent to that under which plaintiff claimed, the latter conveyed nothing to plaintiff.

Read the full summary

From Iredell. Ejjsctmejvt. The plaintiff’s lessor claimed the land in dispute, lying in Lincoln county, by virtue of a grant issuing to his father in 1768 from the crown of Great Britain. The defendant claimed the land under a grant from the state of North-Carolina of recent date; and contended, that the land was within the boundaries of Earl Gran-mile's grant, which being antecedent to that under which plaintiff claimed, the latter conveyed nothing to plaintiff. On the trial below, before Nash, Judge, it appeared that, from the year 1753, acts of the legislature of JNorth-Carolina had been…

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant claimed the land under a grant from the State of North Carolina of recent date, and contended that the land was within the boundaries of Earl Granville's grant, which being antecedent to that under which plaintiff claimed, the latter conveyed nothing to plaintiff.

On the trial before Nash, J., it appeared that from the year 1753 acts of the Legislature of North Carolina had been passed, at various times, up to 1779, which acts call for and point out Earl Granville's line as the boundary between different counties; that in 1772 the line so called for by those acts had been…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wool v. Fleetwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Henderson v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund v. LobeanSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  4. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Williams v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API