Legal Opinion
Lopez v. Ortiz
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided March 31, 2014No. Civil No. 13-1166 (DRD)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are: (a) Motion for a More Definite Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e), Docket No. 8; (b) Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion for a More Definite Statement, Docket No. 10; (c) Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition for a Motion for a More Definite Statement, Docket No. 14, and (d) Supplemental Opposition to Motion for a More Definite Statement, Docket No. 15. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for a more definite statement is granted.
*48Introduction
The instant complaint was filed on February 26, 2013. At the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.