Hufford v. McEnaney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
Brad Hufford alleges that the defendants violated his clearly established First Amendment rights when they discharged him for reporting that fellow firefighters had downloaded a large cache of hard core pornographic files on the firestation’s computers. Defendants appeal from the denial of their summary judgment motion asserting qualified immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
Hufford began his employment with the North Ada County Fire and Rescue District (“the Department”) in January, 1985. *1145In 1992, Hufford was promoted to Shift Captain,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Corales v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Robinson v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Karl v. City of Mountlake TerraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.