Legal Opinion

Hufford v. McEnaney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2001No. 99-36041PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Brad Hufford alleges that the defendants violated his clearly established First Amendment rights when they discharged him for reporting that fellow firefighters had downloaded a large cache of hard core pornographic files on the firestation’s computers. Defendants appeal from the denial of their summary judgment motion asserting qualified immunity under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

Hufford began his employment with the North Ada County Fire and Rescue District (“the Department”) in January, 1985. *1145In 1992, Hufford was promoted to Shift Captain,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Corales v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Robinson v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Karl v. City of Mountlake TerraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API