Legal Opinion

State v. Sewell

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1998No. 78,376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, J.:

This is a sentencing appeal brought by the defendant. On appeal, the defendant contends the district court erred because: (1) there did not exist substantial and compelling reasons to support both a dispositional and an upward durational departure from tire presumptive sentences; (2) the defendant’s full criminal history should not have been applied in both felony cases when consecutive sentences were imposed; and (3) the district court failed to consider placement at the Labette Correctional Conservation Camp (Labette).

We find the district court did err in imposing a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. State v. RhoadsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. State v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. State v. HawesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. State v. SnowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API