State v. Sewell
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Knudson, J.:
This is a sentencing appeal brought by the defendant. On appeal, the defendant contends the district court erred because: (1) there did not exist substantial and compelling reasons to support both a dispositional and an upward durational departure from tire presumptive sentences; (2) the defendant’s full criminal history should not have been applied in both felony cases when consecutive sentences were imposed; and (3) the district court failed to consider placement at the Labette Correctional Conservation Camp (Labette).
We find the district court did err in imposing a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. RhoadsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- State v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- State v. HawesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. SnowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019