Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2010No. Nos. 20090321, 20090322PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert Johnson appealed from the district court’s order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Summary dismissal of the application for post-conviction relief was not appropriate because a district court cannot, on its own motion, dismiss an application on the basis of the affirmative defense of res judicata. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] In 2008, a jury convicted Johnson of two counts of contact by bodily fluids. The bifurcated trial consisted of a criminal act phase and a lack of criminal responsibility phase.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ennis v. DasovickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Berlin v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. DELVO v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Noorlun v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Asset Acceptance LLC v. GrzeskowiakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atkins v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Smestad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Chase v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Williamson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Leverson v. LeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API