Johnson v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert Johnson appealed from the district court’s order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Summary dismissal of the application for post-conviction relief was not appropriate because a district court cannot, on its own motion, dismiss an application on the basis of the affirmative defense of res judicata. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] In 2008, a jury convicted Johnson of two counts of contact by bodily fluids. The bifurcated trial consisted of a criminal act phase and a lack of criminal responsibility phase.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ennis v. DasovickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Berlin v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- DELVO v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Noorlun v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Asset Acceptance LLC v. GrzeskowiakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atkins v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Smestad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Chase v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Williamson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Leverson v. LeversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011