Legal Opinion

City of Katy v. Waterbury

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1979No. A1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SALAZAR, Justice.

Appellant-defendant, The City of Katy, Texas, has appealed from a jury trial granting appellee a permanent injunction and damages. Appellee-plaintiff, Rev. Harrol L. Waterbury, had sought a temporary restraining order, a temporary injunction and a permanent injunction to enjoin appellant, The City of Katy, from constructing or using a roadway across his property. The trial court denied the temporary injunction and on appeal, this decision was affirmed in Waterbury v. City of Katy, 541 S.W.2d 654 (Tex.Civ.App.—Eastland 1976, no writ). Appellant now appeals from an adverse jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haverbekken v. Hale, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. City of Mission v. PopplewellTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. City of Austin v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Cole v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. City of Houston v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. City of Gladewater v. PikeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Victor J. Burgess, D/B/A Eydie's Bail Bonds, and the Local Agent for Seneca Insurance Co., Inc. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API