Sollenbarger v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a plaintiff class under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3) and defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ pendent state law claim. The proposed class includes all present and past customers of Mountain Bell (“MB”) who contracted for inside wire maintenance service (“IWMS”) between 1982 and the present. Dkt. no. 47, H 8(a). Plaintiffs contend MB monopolized IWMS in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and that IWMS contracts are void or voidable under state contract law. The…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Harding v. Tambrands Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Singer v. AT & T Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.