Legal Opinion

Glaspey v. Workman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1988No. 87-402PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Following a joint motion for summary judgment, the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, issued findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment piercing the corporate veil of Bernadette’s, Inc. Glaspey appeals the portion of the judgment which denied attorneys fees and allegedly denied punitive damages. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The issues on appeal are:

1. Did the District Court incorrectly conclude that there is no statutory authorization for the payment of attorneys fees when an employee is forced to pierce the corporate veil in order to collect a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HubbardMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Murphy for LC v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lutzenhiser v. HolzworthMontana Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kuhr v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Hadford v. Credit Bureau of Havre, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Glaspey v. WorkmanMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stimac v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Phelps v. Hillhaven Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API